|
|
|
Isn't the privat static final SimpleDateFormatter not thread-safe? And thus should be change to a object created on need instead.
Indeed, I wasn't aware it was not (but I just looked it up, and you're correct). I'll reopen the issue.
As Claus noted, the current implementation is not thread-safe.
By the way, the real name is RFC3339, can you rename it? :)
Renamed issue, will do the same in the code. Thanks for letting me know :-)
The fix should be merged to the trunk also
Yeah, it should be correct in all branches and trunk. Claus, feel free to reassign the issue and fix it. I currently don't have access to the svn repo, and I'm short on time.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1643