|
|
|
<param name="actionName">User!list</param>
Shouldn't it parse the actionName and seperate the action name and the method name? this.actionName = User this.methodName = list Maybe it's quite easy to fix for 1.1.2? Alex, assigning this one to you... Did you find your patch?
I haven't, but I will take of it ;-).
./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. Added method parameter to configuration (cleaner than the ! notation).
ActionChainResult v1.11 @Alex
So should we use it like this? <result type="chain" name="input.show"> <param name="actionName">User</param> <param name="method">list</param> <param name="namespace">/admin</param> </result> If so shouldn't we add an example to the class javadoc? It's much easier for new users to learn by example I have added the information about the method parameter. Do you think it is still necessary to create another example in which to use the method? (cause there is already one showing how to pass the parameters and considering that the allowed parameters are listed imo this is obvious, but I may be wrong).
./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. @Alex
It's fine. Just that there is an example in the javadoc. This is the place where all the features should be documented. Later someone could add examples to wiki's or to the showcase demo web app. But the javadoc should IMHO always be updated with all the features WW+XW have. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.